PolyPeptide is committed to setting GHG reduction targets. It has established robust internal processes to track and monitor its GHG emissions, utilizing data-driven insights to assess performance against these targets. The Group is committed to promoting more sustainable manufacturing technologies with a focus on energy efficiency, waste reduction, and renewable energy sourcing.
The Group participates in the CDP Disclosure scoring a “B” rating in 2024, and improving for the third consecutive year versus the “B-” rating achieved in 2023 (2022: C). This is complemented by the EcoVadis ratings, where PolyPeptide received an “Advanced”3 rating for its carbon management program in 2024 and a “Bronze” rating for its ESG program.
The Group has set science-based targets for Scopes 1, 2 and 3 following the near-term target methodology of the Science-Based Target initiative4. Charts 1 and 2 illustrate the reduction targets which will be submitted to the Science-Based Target initiative for approval during 2025. For details on the targets, refer to Tables 6 and 7. Depending on the outcome of the validation procedure, the targets might have to be updated.
An assessment is currently underway to define potential long-term objectives aligned with the Paris Agreement, as well as to explore the PolyPeptide’s involvement in setting net-zero targets.
GHG emissions reduction absolute target Scopes 1 and 2 5 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Target ID |
||||
Overall number of active GHG emissions targets: |
2 |
|
|
|
Target number: |
1/2 |
|
|
|
Target type: |
Absolute near-term target |
|
|
|
Date the target was set: |
26.11.2024 |
|
Date the target was last revised: |
does not apply |
|
|
|
|
|
Target information |
||||
Scope(s) covered |
Scopes 1 & 2 (market-based) |
|
|
|
Percentage of in-scope emissions covered by the target |
100% |
|
|
|
Base year: |
2023 |
|
Base year emissions, t CO2e |
10,332 |
Target year: |
2030 |
|
Target year projected emissions, t CO2e |
5993 |
|
|
|
|
|
Targeted reduction from base year (%): |
42% |
|
|
|
Targeted reduction from current year (%): |
42% |
|
Current emissions, t CO2e (2023) |
10,332 |
Target methodology |
||||
Verified by an independent party |
Yes, BDO will be submitted for validation by SBTi during 2025 |
|
|
|
Source that describes transition plan outlining how this target will be met |
Climate Report Metrics and Targets |
|
|
|
Indicate the % of the target to be achieved through offsets |
0% |
|
|
|
5 The template used was created by FTSE Russell to encourage clear and concise disclosures regarding corporate GHG emissions reduction targets.
GHG emissions reduction intensity target Scope 3 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Target ID |
||||
Target number: |
2/2 |
|
|
|
Target type: |
Intensity near-term target |
|
|
|
Date the target was set: |
26.11.2024 |
|
Date the target was last revised: |
does not apply |
|
|
|
|
|
Target information |
||||
Scope(s) covered |
Scope 3 |
|
|
|
Percentage of in-scope emissions covered by the target |
95% |
|
Category 1: purchased goods and services, Category 2: capital goods, Category 3: fuel- and energy-related activities, Category 4: upstream transportation and distribution, Category 5: waste generated in operations |
|
Base year: |
2022 |
|
Base year emissions, t CO2e/USD value added |
5.9 |
Target year: |
2033 |
|
Target year projected emissions, t CO2e/USD value added |
2.3 |
Targeted reduction from base year (%): |
61.07% |
|
|
|
Targeted reduction from current year (%): |
Not available due to a negative EBIT in 2023 |
|
Current emissions, t CO2e/ USD value added (2023) |
Not available due to a negative EBIT in 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
Target methodology |
||||
Verified by an independent party |
Yes, BDO will be submitted for validation by SBTi during 2025 |
|
|
|
Source that describes the methodology used to calculate Scope 3 emissions covered by the target |
Climate Report Metrics and Targets |
|
|
|
Source that describes transition plan outlining how this target will be met |
Climate Report Metrics and Targets |
|
|
|
Indicate the % of the target to be achieved through offsets |
0% |
|
|
|
Apart from the Scope 1 and 2 absolute near-term and Scope 3 intensity near-term target (refer to Table 6 and Table 7), the Group has set the following Scope 3 engagement target: “PolyPeptide Group AG commits that suppliers covering 45% of purchased goods and services by spend, will have science-based targets by FY2030 (baseline 2022).”
In 2024, PolyPeptide conducted its second global carbon footprint assessment (based on available numbers for 2023) in accordance with the GHG Protocol. The Group conducted the assessment according to the following parameters:
For the reporting period 2025, PolyPeptide plans to calculate its 2024 and 2025 global carbon footprint. A digital reporting solution and processes are being implemented to enable PolyPeptide to have a complete 2025 carbon footprint available by the beginning of 2026.
+ 4.7% |
PolyPeptide’s absolute Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions vs 2022 |
- 8.2% |
PolyPeptide’s Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions relative to total revenues vs 2022 |
- 21.1% |
PolyPeptide’s absolute Scope 3 GHG emissions vs 2022 |
- 26.8% |
MWh of electricity consumption/ kg of manufactured product vs 2022 |
54.0% |
of sourced electricity from renewable sources 2023 |
In 2023, the Group decreased the GHG emissions by 18%, from 91,827 metric tons CO2e in 2022 to 75,001 metric tons CO2e in 2023. Thereby, Scope 1 and 2 emissions increased by 4.7%, whereas Scope 3 emissions decreased by 21.1%.
Group's greenhouse gas emissions |
2023 |
2022 |
Total Scope 1 - direct emissions |
5,834 |
5,766 |
Stationary combustion |
4,770 |
4,168 |
Mobile combustion |
223 |
476 |
Process emissions |
490 |
352 |
Refrigerants |
351 |
770 |
Total Scope 2 - indirect energy-related emissions (market-based) |
4,498 |
4,105 |
Purchased electricity (market-based) |
4,408 |
4,021 |
Purchased hot water |
90 |
84 |
Total Scope 3 - upstream and downstream value chain emissions |
64,667 |
81,956 |
Category 1: Purchased goods and services |
20,877 |
19,655 |
Category 2: Capital goods |
31,687 |
45,241 |
Category 3: Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2) |
1,740 |
1,034 |
Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution |
3,286 |
4,446 |
Category 5: Waste generated in operations |
4,742 |
7,487 |
Category 6: Business travel |
274 |
485 |
Category 7: Employee commuting |
1,934 |
3,516 |
Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution |
126 |
92 |
Total: Scope 1, Scope 2 (market-based) and Scope 3 |
75,001 |
91,827 |
Scope 2 location-based |
9,395 |
8,819 |
The substantial reduction in Scope 3 emissions primarily reflects the phasing of large capital expenditure projects across the manufacturing network of the Group.
The increase in Scope 1 and 2 GHG market-based emissions was mainly due to the use of diesel generators at one of the manufacturing sites for several months to bridge the interruption of the ordinary energy supply from renewable energies. Taking into consideration the increased manufacturing volumes during the reporting period, the electricity consumption per kilogram of manufactured product decreased by 26.8%, mainly attributable to energy efficiency measures applied by the Group.
Scope 3 emissions calculation methods for each Scope 3 category are explained in Table 10. In 2023, Category 1 accounted for 32% of PolyPeptide’s Scope 3 emissions, with solvents constituting the most significant portion of the Group’s purchased goods. PolyPeptide is actively seeking supplier-specific emission factors from its tier 1 suppliers. With its Green Master Plan, the Group focuses on reducing the volumes of solvents and reagents relative to production volumes, substituting hazardous chemicals with more sustainable options, and advancing solvent recycling initiatives. The use and sourcing of recycled solvents instead of fresh solvents and the efforts of key-tier 1 suppliers to utilize renewable electricity favorably impacts emissions in Category 1. PolyPeptide is dedicated to fostering a culture of continuous improvement within its own operations and supply chain, which requires shared commitment of its suppliers and business partners.
Scope 3 category |
Calculation method |
|
Category 1: Purchased goods and services |
• |
Supplier-specific |
• |
Average data |
|
• |
Spend-based |
|
Category 2: Capital goods |
• |
Average data |
• |
Spend-based |
|
Category 3: Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2) |
• |
Average data |
Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution |
• |
Distance-based |
Category 5: Waste generated in operations |
• |
Waste-type-specific |
Category 6: Business travel |
• |
Supplier-specific |
• |
Distance-based |
|
Category 7: Employee commuting |
• |
Average data |
• |
Distance-based |
|
Category 8: Upstream leased assets |
• |
Does not apply: Due to the chosen approach to organizational boundary, i.e., operational control approach, any consumption and respective emissions from upstream leased assets have already been included in Scope 1 and 2 emissions. |
Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution |
• |
Distance-based |
Category 10: Processing of sold products |
• |
Does not apply: Calculating GHG emissions from Scope 3, Category 10 is particularly challenging for a company producing both Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) for the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry due to limited data availability from downstream customers. In both sectors, the final products are processed by external parties - pharmaceutical manufacturers or beauty product formulators - whose operations vary widely in scale, technology, and production practices. This lack of consistent and reliable emissions data, coupled with the fragmented nature of these supply chains, makes it difficult to accurately quantify the emissions associated with processing APIs and peptides after they are sold. Furthermore, small-scale or proprietary operations in the beauty industry add another layer of complexity in tracking emissions, compounding the overall challenge. |
Category 11: Use of purchased goods |
• |
Does not apply: PolyPeptide does not manufacture any APIs that make part of medicine in inhalers, which, depending on the model, may require refrigerants for its operation, hence causing emissions in the use phase. Some of APIs manufactured by the Group may need refrigeration, however, it was not evaluated in more detail. |
Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products |
• |
Does not apply: The emissions calculated within this category would only consider end-of-life treatment of packaging, which is not considered material for our PolyPeptide's carbon footprint, hence, not calculated. |
Category 13: Downstream leased assets |
• |
Does not apply: This category does not apply to PolyPeptide. |
Category 14: Franchises |
• |
Does not apply: This category does not apply to PolyPeptide. |
Category 15: Investment |
• |
Does not apply: This category does not apply to PolyPeptide. |
In 2024, PolyPeptide continued to expand the sourcing of renewable electricity for its manufacturing sites. At the end of 2024, the manufacturing sites in Braine-l’Alleud, Malmo, San Diego, and Strasbourg operated with 100% of renewable electricity.
The manufacturing site in San Diego signed up to a local voluntary program to become a “San Diego Community Power100 Champion”. This voluntary program is a San Diego specific initiative that allows businesses to transition from utilizing electricity generated by non-renewable energy sources to getting electricity that comes 100% from renewable, less greenhouse gas intensive energy sources. This means that currently 100% of the electricity purchased to operate the site, comes from renewable sources.
To reach the absolute Scope 1 and 2 near-term targets, PolyPeptide is striving to procure electricity from 100% renewable sources at all sites by 2029, as well as replacing the car fleet with electric cars. These two initiatives are crucial for reaching the 42% reduction target by 2030 versus 2023. Additional initiatives will be required to offset the impact of expected business growth. Consequently, PolyPeptide plans for energy audits across all manufacturing sites to identify and carry out energy-saving measures. During summer 2024, the Ambernath site was awarded an ISO 50001 certification for its energy management system.
In addition, PolyPeptide plans to replace its refrigerants with high Global Warming Potentials (GWPs) with alternatives of lower GWP, where feasible.
PolyPeptide expects that the financial impact for its climate transition plan will be mainly driven by initiatives related to scope 3 emissions reduction as highlighted in Table 11.
Initiative |
Description of the initiative |
Emission reduction in Scope |
Expected GHG emission reduction |
Expected GHG emission reduction |
Base year |
Target year |
Geography coverage |
KPI description |
KPI base year |
KPI target year |
Initiative 1 |
Sourcing 100% renewable electricity by 2029 on all sites |
2 |
-43.9% |
% reduction of the Group's Scope 1 and 2 emissions 2023 |
2023 |
2029 |
All sites |
% of annual externally sourced electricity consumption from renewable sources |
54% |
100.0% |
Initiative 2 |
Replacement of car fleet (thermic/ hybrid) by an electric one in Belgium |
1 |
-3.7% |
% reduction of the Group's Scope 1 and 2 emissions 2023 |
2023 |
2028 |
Belgium |
% of electric car in the PolyPeptide car fleet |
7.4% |
100.0% |
Initiative 3 |
Conducting energy audit on all manufacturing sites to identify potential energy savings |
1 & 2 |
-4.0% |
% reduction of the Group's Scope 1 and 2 emissions 2023 |
2023 |
2029 |
All manufacturing sites |
tCO2e Scope 1 + 2 emissions/ kg of final product manufactured |
5.2 |
4.9 |
MWh of electricity consumption/ kg of manufactured product |
16.1 |
15.5 |
||||||||
Initiative 4 |
Development of an obsolescence management plan to manage refrigerants with high Global Warming Potential (GWP) |
1 |
-4.0% |
% reduction of the Group's Scope 1 and 2 emissions 2023 |
2023 |
2030 |
All manufacturing sites |
tCO2e emissions from refrigerant losses/kg of refrigerant losses |
1.9 |
Under development |
Initiative 5 |
Recycling of solvent and use of recycled solvent for GMP activities |
3 |
See Table 12 |
See Table 12 |
2022 |
2033 |
Belgium, US |
% of recycled solvent used for GMP activities for the reporting year |
3.6% |
Under development |
Initiative 6 |
Segregation of solvent waste and associated treatment |
3 |
See Table 12 |
See Table 12 |
2022 |
2033 |
Sweden, France |
tCO2e from cat. 5/ t of solvent waste generated during operation for the reporting year |
0.8 |
Under development |
Initiative 7 |
Solvent reduction with the implementation of new technology |
3 |
See Table 12 |
See Table 12 |
2022 |
2033 |
All manufacturing sites |
t of solvent/ kg of final product manufactured for the reporting year |
3.4% |
Under development |
Initiative 8 |
Science-based target of the Group's main suppliers |
3 |
See Table 12 |
See Table 12 |
2022 |
2030 |
All manufacturing sites |
% of raw material spend for suppliers with science-based targets for the reporting year |
8% |
45% |
As depicted in Figure 4, PolyPeptide’s key sources of value chain emissions are primarily found in two categories: purchased goods and services (category 1), and capital goods (category 2). It is crucial to note that emissions from category 2 are rather volatile and can vary significantly over time, influenced by the Group’s capital investments and expansion. Currently, PolyPeptide is concentrating on reducing emissions from solvents, which constitute the primary raw material acquired. This approach also goes in line with the two most important climate-related transition risks (changing customer behavior and transition to increasing recycled content). For more detail, refer to the Strategy section. PolyPeptide anticipates a substantial decrease in these emissions through solvent recycling initiatives and by urging its top ten suppliers, in terms of expenditure, to set science-based GHG emission reduction goals.
Initiatives |
|
Financial investment |
|||
Category 1: Purchased goods and services |
Category 2: Capital goods |
Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution |
Category 5: Waste generated in operations |
||
Recycling of solvent and use of recycled solvent for GMP activities |
+++ |
0 |
++ |
+++ |
€€ |
Segregation of solvent waste and associated treatment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
++ |
€€ |
Solvent reduction with the implementation of new technologies |
++ |
0 |
++ |
++ |
€ |
Modular approach for new buildings |
+ |
++ |
0 |
0 |
€€€ |
SBT for 10 main suppliers by spend |
+++ |
0 |
+ |
0 |
€ |
Legend:
The Group is currently tracking climate-related metrics (highlighted in bold in Table 13) and is revising and preparing others for potential inclusion in the annual monitoring process (indicated in italics in Table 13).
In alignment with PolyPeptide’s sustainability goals, capital deployment metrics focus on investments that drive long-term environmental benefits and support the transition to a low-carbon economy. The Group’s capital expenditure is significant, particularly in technologies related to green chemistry and solvent recycling. These investments aim to reduce the environmental impact of PolyPeptide’s manufacturing processes by promoting sustainable practices and circularity. Additionally, PolyPeptide is directing capital towards the exploration and adoption of alternative energy sources, further supporting the Group’s commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving energy efficiency. These strategic investments demonstrate PolyPeptide’s proactive approach to embedding sustainability into its operations and ensure that its capital is deployed in a way that fosters both innovation and environmental responsibility.
At this time, PolyPeptide has not set an internal carbon price, as it has not been identified as a priority within the current climate strategy in accordance with the risk and opportunity assessment. The primary focus remains on the implementation of the established transition plan, which allocates resources to key initiatives that drive tangible emissions reductions. Specifically, the Group is prioritizing the sourcing of renewable electricity, fleet electrification, and the discovery as well as execution of energy efficiency measures through detailed energy audits. These actions are seen as the most effective means to reduce carbon emissions in the near term. While internal carbon pricing is a potential future consideration, the current strategy is centered on operational improvements that deliver measurable and immediate impacts on sustainability.
Regarding remuneration, PolyPeptide maintains a Global Balanced Scorecard (GBSC), annually approved by the Board of Directors, to aid the execution of its strategy and operational plans, as well as to determine executive compensation. The scorecard encompasses financial goals for a specified period and quantitative targets for non-financial metrics including ESG performance objectives. The Remuneration and Nomination Committee pledges to fortify the connection between sustainability goals and PolyPeptide’s Executive Management’s remuneration, aligning with the achievement of these objectives. In 2023, PolyPeptide incorporated the green chemistry program including initiatives with a positive impact on its corporate carbon footprint evaluation into its GBSC. This integration, accounting for 5.1% of the incentives in the GBSC, engaged selected PolyPeptide employees participating in the initiative. The green initiatives in the 2023 GBSC marked a pivotal step for PolyPeptide, initiating the journey towards setting reduction targets and crafting its GHG emissions reduction strategy.
Metrics category |
Metrics |
Metric value 2023 |
||
GHG emissions |
1) |
Absolute Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions (total, split by geography) |
1) |
Refer to Table 9 and Figure 3 |
2) |
Emission intensity (Scope 3 emissions per value added; Scopes 1-3 per revenues) |
2) |
Refer to Table 7 |
|
Transition risks |
1) |
Amount and extent of an organization’s assets or business activities vulnerable to climate-related transition risks |
1) |
Currently in the process of evaluation |
Physical risks |
1) |
Number of extreme weather events by type and location |
1) |
0 days |
2) |
Number of idle days per site due to supply chain disruption |
2) |
0 days |
|
3) |
Number of suppliers with medium-high and high risk likelihood (2030) by risk type |
3) |
Acute – Water: 1 supplier |
|
• |
Chronic – Temperature: 1 supplier |
|||
Climate-related opportunities |
1) |
Revenues from products that support transition to a low-carbon economy |
1) |
Currently in the process of evaluation. Due to the requirements of TCFD, CSRD, and the EU Taxonomy, the Group will use a digital reporting solution to centralize and manage all the necessary metrics in one place, including those mandated by these frameworks. |
Capital deployment |
1) |
Capital expenditures of the Innovation department, including technologies related to green chemistry/solvent recycling, |
1) |
1.28 MEUR |
2) |
Investment in alternative energy sources |
|
|
|
Internal carbon prices |
1) |
Not determined |
1) |
Internal carbon pricing has not been identified as a priority for the Group. Given the established transition plan and the allocated budget for its implementation, the Group's focus is on sourcing renewable electricity, fleet electrification, and discovering and executing energy efficiency measures via energy audits. |
Remuneration |
1) |
Weighting of performance against deployment of initiatives impacting operational emissions’ targets for remuneration scorecard |
1) |
5.1% of the global scorecard |